Week 3 — Causal Inference I: Potential Outcomes, Selection-on-Observables, and Instruments
Correlation is cheap; the Rubin causal model makes “effect” precise, and we earn causal claims through design, not control variables. See ../../TOC.md for the full plan.
Chapters
- Ch 3.1 — Potential Outcomes, SUTVA, and the Fundamental Problem
- Ch 3.2 — Selection on Observables I: Matching & Propensity Scores
- Ch 3.3 — Selection on Observables II: Entropy Balancing & Doubly-Robust
- Ch 3.4 — Instrumental Variables (relevance/exclusion, 2SLS-as-FWL, LATE, weak IV)
- Ch 3.5 — Reading IV in the Wild + The Weak-IV Pathology (Anderson–Rubin, many-instruments bias)
Notebooks (../../../notebooks/week-03/)
- nb3.1 Potential outcomes & selection bias · nb3.2 PSM with balance diagnostics · nb3.3 Entropy balancing vs. IPW vs. AIPW · nb3.4 2SLS with first-stage F · nb3.5 Weak-IV pathology (conventional coverage 0.80 vs. Anderson–Rubin 0.97)
- All verified to run headless; numbers reproduce the chapters bit-for-bit.
Problem sets (solutions in Appendix E)
Lab, mentor, assessment
- Lab 3 — Reproduce a Weak-IV Pathology (pure simulation; AR CIs as the fix)
- Mentor Session 3 — “Natural experiments: finding the lever nature pulled” (Deng, Gao & Kim 2020, JCF)
- Week 3 Assessment + Rubric